New York Committeemen  JOIN OUR MEETUP
 Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise: Proverbs 6:6





Click on a button above to follow our common law actions at law. You can support our endeavor to take back our judicial process by signing up as a plaintiffs and/or donating. Please consider an occasional or monthly donation of $20 or more.




Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties which may make anything mean everything or nothing at pleasure”     Thomas Jefferson



Commit to six hours a week [one hour a day or 5 hours on Saturday and 1 hour a week on our Monday night conference call] and in less than a year this site can teach you how to "ACCESS THE COURTS WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY" and how to force the courts to acknowledge your unalienable rights by opening a "COURT OF RECORD UNDER COMMON LAW" free of charge we just ask that you support us as often as you can.




To make a quality decision, consider the following:


If We consult the latest Corpus Juris Secundurr (C.J.S.) legal encyclopedia, volume 7, section 4, We will find that an attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public; not the client: According to Section 2 in said Section 7, we find that clients are "wards of the court:"

Wards of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind. [Davis' Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d 189, 190. Their rights must be guarded jealously. Montgomery v. Erie R. Co., C.C.A.N.J., 97 F.2d 289, 292.]

LUNATIC. [Black's Law 4th edition] A person of deranged or unsound mind; a person whose mental faculties are in the condition called "lunacy"; one who possessed reason, but through disease, grief, or other cause has lost it. May mean all insane persons or persons of unsound mind, sometimes including and sometimes excluding idiots. [Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v. Lay, 175 Okl. 75, 51 P.2d 580, 582.]


So only idiots or lunatics hire an attorney! Think about it the next time you think you need to hire an attorney.



The difference between a civil lawsuit and a common law suit is as follows:

Civil Law Case Common Law Case
Argued on statutes (aka [fake] law) Argued on Constitutions (Law of the land)
Argued by Bar approved Lawyers Argued by People
Lawyers will plead in legalese People will plead with plain language
Lawyers will make back room deals People will not go to the back room
Will argue the "New York save act" We will argue all gun laws incl. permits,
we want all our rights
Constitutional arguments are restricted We will produce arguments that the
state cannot possibly defend against
  We will quote our founding fathers
Our papers will be historic, patriotic
and constitutional
  We will expose the fraud of statutes call
Standing under the constitution, 14th amendment Standing above the constitution, we the
  We will bluntly argue the history of the
of the 20th century of all the nations
disarmed after which genocide
The status quo Judge will decide Our case will be a court of record, whereas
the people will decide the outcome of the case.
  We will say bold things that lawyers never will.
  Lawyers for the state will be dumb-
founded by our statements and positions.
  We will make positions that for the
to go against they would need
to reject
Thomas Jefferson, George
John Adams, James
Madison, George Mason, Patrick
Henry, Thomas Paine,
Samuel Adams,
Richard Henry Lee,
Trench Coxe, Noah
Webster, John Locke,
48 State, Constitutions, US
Declaration of
Independence, Magna Carta,
People, Such a
contrast will expose
the Marxists/Fascist positions
that the
state holds,and we will make it
clear that
the people is the last step to
dictatorship, and the people simply
will not comply.
  We will not ask for our "unalienable right"
to be armed, we will demand it, and defy any who resists us.
  In short, we will not "tip toe" around
the issues we will plow right through them.